Eligibility and relevant date
Identify the statutory category, relevant date and filing window before spending time on the application pack.
Assess the legal route, reconcile the claim period and prepare the statements, undertakings and transaction evidence before submitting a GST refund application.
For eligible exports, supplies to SEZ, inverted duty accumulation, excess electronic cash ledger balances and other fact-specific refund situations across India.
The original page-specific roadmap is retained here, with every detail available after the quick enquiry panel.
REFUND READINESS
Identify the statutory category, relevant date and filing window before spending time on the application pack.
Match the claim with GSTR 1, GSTR 3B, shipping, SEZ, invoice and ledger information for the relevant period.
Prepare category-specific workings and test exclusions, adjusted turnover, net ITC and other formula components where applicable.
Organise invoices, declarations, bank realisation or export evidence, endorsements and certificates required by the facts.
Prepare the applicable refund application, statements and attachments through the GST portal with an internal review record.
Track acknowledgement, deficiency memo, clarification, sanction or rejection and preserve every communication and response.
DECISION TABLE
| Refund situation | Typical trigger | Evidence focus | Key review point |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01Zero-rated supply without tax | Export or eligible SEZ supply under bond or LUT | Invoices, shipping or endorsement records, returns and realisation evidence | Accumulated eligible ITC and category-specific exclusions |
| 02Zero-rated supply with tax | Tax paid on an eligible zero-rated supply | Tax invoice, return, export or SEZ evidence and payment trail | Availability of the route under current law and notifications |
| 03Inverted duty structure | Input tax rate exceeds output tax rate for covered supplies | HSN classification, rate mapping, turnover and ITC workings | Excluded supplies, formula and relevant-period accuracy |
| 04Excess cash ledger | Balance remains in the electronic cash ledger | Cash ledger, challans and liability history | Amount is genuinely excess and not needed against pending liability |
| 05Wrong or excess payment | Tax, interest or another amount was paid beyond the lawful liability | Payment, return, order and reconciliation evidence | Correct statutory category and unjust-enrichment treatment |
| 06Order or other category | Refund arises from an order, assessment or another permitted circumstance | Order, appellate record, payment evidence and computation | Finality, limitation and portal route |
A REFUND IS NOT A BALANCE WITHDRAWAL
Input tax credit follows statutory utilisation and refund restrictions; it cannot be withdrawn merely because it is unused.
Goods, services and SEZ supplies use different evidence and realisation or endorsement considerations.
An acknowledgement or application reference does not confirm that the amount has been approved.
Claim periods, amended invoices and return reporting must be coordinated to avoid duplication or omitted turnover.
The claimant may need to establish that the tax burden was not passed on, subject to the category and law.
A deficiency memo, show-cause communication or rejection order has a distinct response route and timeline.
DOCUMENT READINESS
OUR WORKFLOW
Identify the statutory refund category, relevant date, period and preliminary eligibility.
Match returns, ledgers, invoices and transaction evidence and resolve material differences.
Review the computation, declarations, documents and filing position with the authorised taxpayer.
Submit the application, preserve the ARN and manage portal communications through the final order.
RISK CONTROL
GST REFUND QUESTIONS
Eligibility can arise from specified zero-rated supplies, inverted duty accumulation, excess cash ledger balances, excess or wrong payments, orders and other situations permitted by GST law. The facts and category must be checked first.
No. The supply, return reporting, LUT or tax-paid route, export evidence, realisation requirements for services and statutory restrictions must be reviewed.
Only in situations permitted by law, such as qualifying zero-rated or inverted-duty accumulation, subject to exclusions and formula conditions.
It identifies deficiencies in the application under the portal process. Its effect and the next filing step should be reviewed from the communication and current rules.
Processing depends on category, completeness, verification, queries and departmental action. A professional should not promise a universal approval timeline.
An order should be reviewed promptly to identify rectification, fresh-claim or appeal options and their respective limitations.
No. RegisCorp can support eligibility analysis, reconciliation, filing and responses; sanction remains with the competent tax authority.
Choose the right RegisCorp desk
Start with the closest match. Each route asks only for the information needed to review that type of request.
Published by RegisCorp Consultancy LLP. About RegisCorp · Ask a question or report a correction